昨天将 ”One Malaysia” 一个马来西亚的 “ Rakyat Didahulukan, Pencapaian diutamakan” 口号翻译成“以民为本,绩效为先”,战战兢兢,不懂谁可以给意见。于是在开着内阁会议时,传了一个短讯给我党总会长拿督斯里翁诗杰,问他对这个翻译的看法。由於忙开会,忘了这回事。。。
当我看了亚洲娱乐台的’新闻报报看‘,在观赏港剧’巾帼枭雄‘的时候,手机响了。看看手表,已经十一时五十六分。翁总回复了。原来他还没有睡。另一边传来的短讯认同了我的翻译,让我雀跃万分!
为国为民,三更半夜还在回短讯,有时还换来别人的辱骂,唉!俗语有说:「前人种树,后人乘凉」,而我们的翁总可就惨咯!别人偷吃,翁总当灾!前人所种下的祸根,让他忙得头晕传向,一不小心,可能还要面对千夫指或小人的蓄意抹黑!
我们可以看到的就是民主行动党的林吉祥,天天忙着开记者招待会或发文告,对翁总来个痴痴缠;管你三七二十一,对翁总来个贴身战术,缠个没完没了!
巴生港口自由贸易区的案件,看似简单。个中却有千丝万缕,剪不断,理还乱。公说公有理,婆说婆有理!不过,不管你公婆怎么闹,广大人民的心中早已经为有关案件拟定了一个既定的答。。。
那就是,肯定有许多人促成今天的局面。肯定有许多人因为这个计划‘吃得胖胖的’!没人涉贪,打死也不信!
当我看了亚洲娱乐台的’新闻报报看‘,在观赏港剧’巾帼枭雄‘的时候,手机响了。看看手表,已经十一时五十六分。翁总回复了。原来他还没有睡。另一边传来的短讯认同了我的翻译,让我雀跃万分!
为国为民,三更半夜还在回短讯,有时还换来别人的辱骂,唉!俗语有说:「前人种树,后人乘凉」,而我们的翁总可就惨咯!别人偷吃,翁总当灾!前人所种下的祸根,让他忙得头晕传向,一不小心,可能还要面对千夫指或小人的蓄意抹黑!
我们可以看到的就是民主行动党的林吉祥,天天忙着开记者招待会或发文告,对翁总来个痴痴缠;管你三七二十一,对翁总来个贴身战术,缠个没完没了!
巴生港口自由贸易区的案件,看似简单。个中却有千丝万缕,剪不断,理还乱。公说公有理,婆说婆有理!不过,不管你公婆怎么闹,广大人民的心中早已经为有关案件拟定了一个既定的答。。。
那就是,肯定有许多人促成今天的局面。肯定有许多人因为这个计划‘吃得胖胖的’!没人涉贪,打死也不信!
翁总当灾不当灾不是最重要,马华的人才多得不胜枚举。最重要的是到了今天还看不到我党雪州的具体反击民联戦略。
回覆刪除马华的人才多得不胜枚举? 你真的是"胡"説八道,乱七八糟.
回覆刪除3 点回一个SMS就让你雀跃万分,
回覆刪除我这里3 点经常也会有人在那里打枪,偷钱,偷车就为了哪三餐;弄到我多不好意思,还在考虑着是不是要假装掉钱包给他们,让他们不要这样内疚。
chchoo ,
回覆刪除我不介意你骂我"胡"説八道,乱七八糟。每一个人都应该有他自己的见解。社会有不同的见解才会有进步不是吗?如果每个人都是一样的见解,那再过50年我国也不会有改变。只要目标是没错,条条道路通罗马。
政党内民主主义是我的路线图, 新普通国民主义是我的理想.
其实大家都希望看见世界和平,阿弥佗佛!
回覆刪除LBN仔
Dear 伯芳,
回覆刪除I admit that my comments above are distasteful. I meant to send you a strong message, and hopefully a wakeup call to you.
If MCA is full of talented people, MCA would have detected the shift of votes before 308 and did something about it. MCA should have been seen as an equal partner in the BN government and many mores. I wish you can prove me wrong but it’s an uphill task.
Another piece of advice for you. You might have either forgotten to read the history of the World War 2 or have only read the Japanese version of WWII. 大東亜共栄圏 may be well preached and received by the Japanese but it caused millions of lives all over Asia. The “democracy” preached by MCA was rejected in 308. How can you preach democracy while upholding the draconian ISA, and do nothing about it.
My sincere apology if you feel offended but I prefer to call a spade a spade. Thus, I decided to call it quit after realizing that MCA cannot play an effective role in the government under the current lame leadership.
Anyway, I admire your efforts to do something meaningful for the people of Bukit Koman, at least you have a good sense.
chchoo兄貴、
回覆刪除很高兴能在此和你交流。
我党废物很多,但人才也不少是铁一般的事实。
别的支会不说,就拿我本身的支会来说:
一位博士,一位律师,两位硕士,两位校长,6位学士等专才。
这十年来我们努力朔造一个清廉支会,勇于支持弱势群体正义的行为,敢于反对贪官权贵的横行霸道。308前我们的声音太小,308后我们的声音也是一样的小。声音小并不代表我们没有为平等而斗争。声音大如国阵民联政治明星又如何?巫统,马华,民政,行动党,公正党,回教党等有政党内民主主义吗?
没有支持民联并不代表不支持民主,没有支持民联并不代表逐渐对民衆陌生,没有支持民联也不代表心中不牵挂民主。我们看到民联在308的大胜,一点也不伤心反而非常兴奋,因为民联帮了我们缩短了马华的改革时间,马华有了重生的机会。
关于大東亜共栄圏,大多数日本的人民不管是二战时或是今日的日本人,他们都对大東亜共栄圏的概念不是很清楚。大東亜共栄圏只是二战时的一个口号。当时东条英机一人掌管陆军,内政部再当首相,一人独霸天下,人称“東條幕府”。一个管理国家的政党如果没有“政党内民主主义”那人民的权益一定会被抛到九霄之外。如果当时有党内民主制度来治横东条英机的暴政,日军就不会在大東亜造孽。为了反东条英机的暴政也有不少日本的民主派人员被杀害。
马华领导不敢对一些课题表达出华人的心身是因为马华的党内民主制度治横不了废物领导。除了废物领导我想很少马华党员会不反对ISA。只要我们把党内民主制度做好那马华还是我们的首选政党。
爱党,既要为历史上的辉煌和今天的成就而自豪,也要为传统的专制和今天的落后感到羞耻。
Dear 伯芳, having an academic degree does not mean a person is a talent. It only means that an individual has a specific skill and knowledge on certain subject matter. Look at Lim Goh Tong, Loh Boon Siew and even Bill Gates, they do not have any academic degree but people look upon them as talented individual. Well, I was naive to think that MCA can reform and become an effective party within BN, I gave up because I do not think that we can change a thing by sticking around, not to mention the current leadership team. Anyway, I will do MCA a favor by asking at least 100 people I know to vote against MCA in the next election, hopefully the number will multiply.
回覆刪除As you said, MCA can only be reborn after its death.
chchoo兄貴、
回覆刪除You can ask even more than multiply to vote against MCA. OTK and CSL may care about this but basically we don't care about it at all. If PKR can performance better than BN in coming future we will vote for PR also. Neither BN nor PR as long as they able to answer our need we will vote for them.
The argument you brought out regarding Lim Goh Tong, Loh Boon Siew and even Bill Gates is a power phase. May be we are not good enough in politicking’s talent if compare with PR members but we know what and how to participate or play our role in such a complicated society.